4 Ways In Situ Simulation Can Improve Care Quality in the ICU

How often are you able to get out of your own Intensive Care Unit (ICU) to look at it from a distance – to solve problems, to improve efficiencies, or to reflect on past performance? Although each ICU may have its own unique culture and environment, most share the challenge of finding time to step away for the sake of quality improvement.
The great news is that one of the most effective ways of stepping away is by not stepping away at all. It’s by replicating cases in your own ICU environment. This is what simulationists call in situ simulation.
In situ simulation, simulation conducted in the actual patient care environment, has emerged as one of the most powerful tools to drive healthcare quality improvement.1
By bringing realistic, high-stakes simulation scenarios directly into the ICU, in situ simulation allows teams to test systems, uncover blind spots, and refine workflows before harm occurs.
In this article, we explore four ways that in situ simulation can help ICU leadership, risk management, and quality management teams achieve their goals and ultimately improve patient safety.
- Jennifer McCarthy, MAS, NRP, CHSE-A
Director of Clinical Simulation at
Seton Hall University and President/Founder, 579 Solutions
In situ simulation is a valuable resource for identifying latent safety threats, or “accidents waiting to happen.”3
Because in situ simulation takes place in the actual clinical setting, it can lend a unique opportunity to uncover latent safety threats involving your ICU’s own space, equipment, processes, and protocols before they ever reach a patient.
In situ simulation can give your team the chance to “stress test” systems in real time, revealing latent safety threats like:
For example, a simulated sudden deterioration in the patient may test for medication errors and issues such as incorrect dosing or omissions in the prescribed dose. Or, that a delay in paging the on-call anesthesiologist adds precious minutes to airway management. Once uncovered, these findings can be addressed before a real patient is at risk.
Simulation Pro Tip:
A tetherless simulator designed for in situ simulation, like SimMan® Critical Care, can allow teams to progress through transition of care, focusing on scenarios involving respiratory care, critical care, and anesthesia. Combining it with a mobile recording system like SimCapture Mobile App allows you to record the scenario, annotate latent safety threats as they arise, and analyze the findings later.
Research shows that breakdowns in communication among critical care teams are a major contributor to adverse events.4
The ICU is its own unique environment and culture – with providers caring for uniquely unstable patients. This necessitates a level of teamwork and communication that must be second nature for ICU teams to maximize their effectiveness. Breakdowns in communication can be catastrophic, whether it’s an incorrect medication order, a delayed intubation, or an unclear handoff.
In situ simulation allows multidisciplinary teams to practice critical interactions during ICU emergencies, from anesthesia complications to rapid deterioration from sepsis.
By simulating (and effectively debriefing) these high-stakes moments, teams can work on developing shared mental models, clear role definitions, and an instinct for concise, precise communication.
- Lisa Brown, RN, MSN, CHSE
Senior Simulation Education Specialist at Cleveland Clinic
Simulation Pro Tip:
Debriefing is the “heart and soul” of simulation.6 With SimCapture, you can make debriefing smarter and more efficient. Review recordings using AI-powered transcripts and annotations to drive meaningful discussions, while performance data shows teams the true impact they have on the patient.
Quality improvement thrives on meaningful data. In situ simulation produces rich, actionable information about how your ICU actually functions under stress – from time-to-intervention metrics to medication error rates during emergencies.
In situ simulation provides data on metrics such as:
Once identified, this data can become the starting point for targeted process changes.
Simulation Pro Tip:
Your simulations will yield a tremendous amount of performance data. SimCapture can help you organize all of that data into meaningful and actionable insights. You can benchmark performance over time, identify areas of improvement for teams, and use the data to drive continuous quality improvement.
- Atul Gawande, MD, MPH
renowned surgeon, author, and public health leader
Even the best-designed protocols can fail under the realities of ICU care – especially in high-pressure scenarios such as managing sepsis or responding to pulmonary embolism.
The importance of in situ simulation is that it allows you to test any improvements in your own real environment before putting those improvements into place. In an environment where patients are inherently at risk, simulation affords you the opportunity to simulate any action before ever implementing improvements on a live patient.
This approach minimizes risk, gives you objective patient data, ensures protocols are practical and efficient, and increases staff confidence in executing them correctly.
Simulation Pro Tip:
Use SimMan Critical Care to run protocol-focused scenarios. Record the scenarios using SimCapture, and review the footage to spot inefficiencies or gaps that could compromise safety before the protocol reaches the bedside.
To maximize the quality improvement potential of in situ simulation, consider these quick tips:
Victoria Brazil, MD, is a simulation practitioner and thought leader on how simulation may be connected directly with health service priorities and patient outcomes. In this podcast, she speaks about how simulation can be used to continuously improve systems, leading to breakthroughs in patient safety, care efficiency, and systems improvement.
1. Yang, C. J., Saggar, V., Seneviratne, N., Janzen, A., Ahmed, O., Singh, M., Restivo, A., Yoon, A., Bajaj, K., Ahmed, S., Moseley, M., Moss, H., & Jafri, F. N. (2023). In situ Simulation as a quality improvement tool to identify and mitigate latent safety threats for Emergency Department SARS-COV-2 Airway Management: a Multi-Institutional Initiative. The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety, 49(6–7), 297–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjq.2023.02.005
2. Ferre, A., Giglio, A., Van, N., Garcia, J., Benites, M., Vergara, K., María Galleguillos, Dreyse, J., & Hasbun, P. (2024). In situ simulation in the intensive care unit: A phenomenological study of staff experiences. Perfusion. https://doi.org/10.1177/02676591241272058
3. Yang, C. J., Saggar, V., Seneviratne, N., Janzen, A., Ahmed, O., Singh, M., Restivo, A., Yoon, A., Bajaj, K., Ahmed, S., Moseley, M., Moss, H., & Jafri, F. N. (2023). See reference #1.
4. Reader, T. W., Flin, R., & Cuthbertson, B. H. (2007). Communication skills and error in the intensive care unit. Current Opinion in Critical Care, 13(6), 732–736. https://doi.org/10.1097/mcc.0b013e3282f1bb0e
5. Gómez-Pérez, V., Escrivá Peiró, D., Sancho-Cantus, D., & Casaña Mohedo, J. (2023). In Situ Simulation: A Strategy to Restore Patient Safety in Intensive Care Units after the COVID-19 Pandemic? Systematic Review. Healthcare, 11(2), 263. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11020263
6. Rall, M., Manser, T., & Howard, S. K. (2000). Key elements of debriefing for simulator training. European Journal of Anaesthesiology, 17(8), 516–517. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2346.2000.00724-1.x
7. Atul Gawande. (2011). The Checklist Manifesto: How to Get Things Right. Profile Books.