How Can Simulation Drive Quality Improvement in Your Healthcare Setting?
Simulation isn't just for educating and training individuals. It can expose system flaws, test solutions, and drive real improvements for better, safer care.
Learn More
Translational simulation doesn’t require a simulation center or a large budget to make a difference. It requires intent, structure, and integration. When done right, it becomes part of the way a hospital learns—not an extra task layered on top.
Healthcare teams are stretched thin. Between staffing shortages, accreditation requirements, daily patient care, and quality metrics, the idea of adding yet another initiative—even one as promising as translational simulation—can feel overwhelming.
That’s understandable. But here’s the good news: translational simulation doesn’t have to be large-scale, expensive, or disruptive. When integrated thoughtfully, it becomes a low-burden, high-impact tool that supports—not competes with—daily operations.
"This kind of work is a strategy, not an event."1
Dr. Victoria Brazil,
Director, Bond Translational Simulation Collaborative; Professor of Emergency Medicine and Director of Simulation, Bond University

Traditional views of simulation are often tied to education centers, manikins, and structured scenarios. But translational simulation operates differently. It’s:
Rather than scheduling a quarterly simulation day, translational simulation becomes a mode of inquiry and improvement—built into how the organization operates.
Organizations that are fully immersed in using simulation for quality improvement devote considerable resources to their efforts with resulting high returns on their energy and investment. If you are just getting started, here is a way you can still have major impact.
Pick a known challenge—something you’re already trying to improve. Maybe it’s delayed response to pediatric sepsis, miscommunication during trauma alerts, or uncertainty in a new escalation protocol. Design one 15–30-minute simulation around that.
Example: Before opening a newly designed trauma center, clinicians at a hospital in Toronto, Canada conducted simulation exercises that revealed workflow issues, equipment placement problems, and communication challenges. Changes were made before the first patient entered the unit, reducing latent safety threats and improving readiness.2
Before launching a new protocol, medication, or process, test it in action through simulation.
"It’s a way to crash test the system just like you would crash test a car to make sure it’s as safe and effective as possible. This allowed us to iron out the kinks so that by the time real trauma patients were involved, the only impact they were more likely to see was better outcomes."3
Dr. Andrew Petrosoniak MSc (Med Ed), FRCPC,
Emergency Physician and Trauma Team Leader at St. Michael’s Hospital in Toronto, Canada

Integrating simulation into your existing QI or implementation plan makes it proactive, not additive.
Treat simulation like a stethoscope for your system. Use it during:
These are natural points where a 10–15-minute simulation fits—and where it can reveal system-level issues.
You don't always need the most sophisticated technology or full simulation centers. For translational simulation, the focus is workflow, communication, space, and process. Use what gives you the most immersive experience for the circumstances at hand.
Always consider the level of feedback you want from the patient perspective. If you want no feedback, a skills trainer or even a mock patient may be appropriate. If you need verbal response, a standardized patient may work. If you need to know impact on patient condition and correlating data, an appropriate mannequin will be your best choice.
"We used simulation-informed clinical design to put both our old and new trauma bays through their paces. To do so, we brought a number of simulation modalities to bear, selected based on the task at hand."4
Dr. Andrew Petrosoniak
Don’t wait for a single simulation champion to do it all. Instead, train a core team of facilitators—including nurses, physicians, quality leaders, and educators—to run and debrief simulations. This shared model builds internal capability—and resilience.
Tip: Use brief “STOP/THINK/ACT” debriefs rather than long-form reviews. Even 5 minutes of structured discussion can yield insights.
Tie simulation directly to ongoing safety efforts, such as:
By using simulation as part of a Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycle, you avoid creating a new initiative—instead, you strengthen an existing one.
"Simulation can become a testbed. It can become a place where the people who are actually doing the work get to explore it and get to offer ideas about how to make it better."5
Dr. Victoria Brazil
Not every simulation needs to be a research study. Start with “micro-simulations” and track simple ...outcomes. Just some examples are:
Share results in safety huddles, department meetings, or dashboards. Once embedded, you can expand to larger studies and publications.
Their trauma team used quick, iterative simulations to test and redesign their trauma bay before construction. Each simulation session lasted under 45 minutes but uncovered dozens of safety threats.6
Bryan Health facilitated 20-minute in-situ hemorrhage simulations across 12 rural hospitals. These short, staff-led exercises led to improved emergency cart placement and transfusion protocols—without requiring large-scale simulation days.7
If you're ready to begin—or improve—translational simulation without taxing your team, here’s a simple plan:
Step |
Description |
| 1. Pick one process | Choose a real-world workflow to test (e.g., code blue, OB hemorrhage, sepsis response). |
| 2. Design a 20-minute scenario | Use real rooms, real gear, and current staff. Focus on flow, timing, and team communication. |
| 3. Observe & debrief | Watch for latent safety threats. Use a short team debrief: “What helped? What hindered?” |
| 4. Implement a fix | Adjust layout, communication, or supplies. |
| 5. Re-test & reinforce | Run again to evaluate the fix. Share results. Build momentum. |
Translational simulation doesn’t need to be big to be effective. Start small, focus on real problems, use what you have, and embed learning into daily operations.
Translational simulation doesn’t need to overwhelm—it needs to integrate. It’s not extra work. It’s better work, done smarter, sooner, and together.